2008/08/22
知財実務家必見！ 知財英語ドリル！
■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ 知財実務家必見！ 知財英語ドリル！ ２００８年８月２２日 第９２号 ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ■☆■ ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ ◆【今日の問題】 （１）general successions （２）inheritance （３）employer ↓↓↓用例は広告の下にあります↓↓↓ 〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜 ■■■■ ■■■■■ 【出光カードまいどプラス】 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 年会費永久無料！（ＥＴＣカード年会費も無料！！） ■ ■ ■■■■■ いつでもガソリン・軽油が２円／Ｌ引き！ ■■■■ ■ ■ ただいま、入会特別キャンペーン実施中！特典満載！ http://af1.mag2.com/m/af/0000200597/001/s00000001595001/005 ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ ◆【用例】 日本国特許法 Article 34 (1) The succession of the right to obtain a patent prior to the filing of the patent application shall have no effect on any third party unless the successor in title files the patent application. (2) Where two or more patent applications are filed on the same date based on the right to obtain the same patent based on succession from the same person, any succession(s) by a person(s) other than those selected by consultations between the applicants shall have no effect on any third party. (3) The preceding paragraph shall apply where applications for a patent and a utility model registration are filed on the same date based on the right to obtain a patent and the right to obtain a utility model registration for the same invention and device based on succession from the same person. (4) Any succession to the right to obtain a patent after the filing of the patent application shall have no effect, except in the case of general successions including inheritance, without notification to the Commissioner of the patent Office. (5) Where a general succession to the right to obtain a patent including inheritance thereof occurs, the successor in title shall notify the Commissioner of the patent Office thereof without delay. (6) Where two or more notifications are submitted on the same date regarding successions to the right to obtain the same patent based on succession from the same person, any notification(s) by a person(s) other than the person selected by consultations between the persons submitting the notifications shall have no effect. (7) Articles 39(7) and 39(8) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases prescribed in paragraphs (2), (3) and (6). Articel 35(Inventions by Employees) (1) An employer, a juridical person or a national or local government (hereinafter referred to as "employer, etc."), where an employee, an officer of the juridical person, or a national or local government employee (hereinafter referred to as "employee, etc.") has obtained a patent for an invention which, by the nature of the said invention, falls within the scope of the business of the said employer, etc. and was achieved by an act(s) categorized as a present or past duty of the said employee, etc. performed for the employer, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "employee invention") or where a successor to the right to obtain a patent for the employee invention has obtained a patent therefor, shall have a non-exclusive license on the said patent right. (2) In the case of an invention by an employee, etc., any provision in any agreement, employment regulation or any other stipulation providing in advance that the right to obtain a patent or that the patent rights for any invention made by an employee, etc. shall vest in the employer, etc., or that an exclusive license for the said invention shall be granted to the employer, etc., shall be null and void unless the said invention is an employee invention. (3) Where the employee, etc., in accordance with any agreement, employment regulation or any other stipulation, vests the right to obtain a patent or the patent right for an employee invention in the employer, etc., or grants an exclusive license therefor to the employer, etc., the said employee, etc. shall have the right to receive reasonable value. (4) Where an agreement, employment regulation or any other stipulation provides for the value provided in the preceding paragraph, the payment of value in accordance with the said provision (s) shall not be considered unreasonable in light of circumstances where a negotiation between the employer, etc. and the employee, etc. had taken place in order to set standards for the determination of the saidvalue, the set standards had been disclosed, the opinions of the employee, etc. on the calculation of the amount of the value had been received and any other relevant circumstances. (5) Where no provision setting forth the value as provided in the preceding paragraph exists, or where it is recognized under the preceding paragraph that the amount of the value to be paid in accordance with the relevant provision(s) is unreasonable, the amount of the value under paragraph (3) shall be determined by taking into consideration the amount of profit to be received by the employer, etc. from the invention, the employer, etc.'s burden, contribution, and treatment of the employee, etc. and any other circumstances relating to the invention. ↓↓↓解答は広告の下にあります↓↓↓ 〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜 ■━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━■ 生命保険のお申し込みは生命保険ベストナビ http://af1.mag2.com/m/af/0000200597/001/s00000002877007/007 ■━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━■ ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ ◆【解答】 （１）一般承継 （２）相続 （３）使用者 ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ ◆【発行者情報】 メルマガ名 ：知財実務家必見！ 知財英語ドリル！ 発 行 者 ：特許十郎 発行者サイト：http://patentoro.web.fc2.com/e_drill.html 発行者メール：patentoro@yahoo.co.jp 発行システム：まぐまぐ！ http://www.mag2.com/ 購読解除 ：http://www.mag2.com/m/0000256713.html 是非、下記の姉妹メルマガもご購読下さい！ 姉妹メルマガ：特許実務家が語る！ 弁理士試験から考える知財実務！ 発行者サイト：http://patentoro.web.fc2.com/ Copyright(c) 2008 特許十郎. All Rights Reserved ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
